2026 Rankings

25 Safest Cities to Live in 2026

Crime rates vary wildly across US metros. This ranking finds the cities with the fewest violent and property crimes per capita. For families, retirees, and anyone who values peace of mind, this matters a lot.

Methodology

Scoring weights: violent crime rate (60%, inverted), property crime rate (40%, inverted). Both rates are per 100,000 residents.

1

Manchester-Nashua

New Hampshire

94/100

Violent Crime

107/100k

Property Crime

889/100k

Population

427,354

State

New Hampshire

2

Lebanon-Claremont

New Hampshire

94/100

Violent Crime

107/100k

Property Crime

889/100k

Population

225,159

State

New Hampshire

3

Concord

New Hampshire

94/100

Violent Crime

107/100k

Property Crime

889/100k

Population

157,103

State

New Hampshire

4

Keene

New Hampshire

94/100

Violent Crime

107/100k

Property Crime

889/100k

Population

77,703

State

New Hampshire

5

Laconia

New Hampshire

94/100

Violent Crime

107/100k

Property Crime

889/100k

Population

65,027

State

New Hampshire

6

Portland-South Portland

Maine

92/100

Violent Crime

102/100k

Property Crime

1121/100k

Population

566,329

State

Maine

7

Bangor

Maine

92/100

Violent Crime

102/100k

Property Crime

1121/100k

Population

155,312

State

Maine

8

Augusta-Waterville

Maine

92/100

Violent Crime

102/100k

Property Crime

1121/100k

Population

127,259

State

Maine

9

Lewiston-Auburn

Maine

92/100

Violent Crime

102/100k

Property Crime

1121/100k

Population

113,765

State

Maine

10

Providence-Warwick

Rhode Island

88/100

Violent Crime

168/100k

Property Crime

1121/100k

Population

1,677,803

State

Rhode Island

11

Boise City

Idaho

88/100

Violent Crime

234/100k

Property Crime

809/100k

Population

826,521

State

Idaho

12

Coeur d'Alene

Idaho

88/100

Violent Crime

234/100k

Property Crime

809/100k

Population

185,010

State

Idaho

13

Idaho Falls

Idaho

88/100

Violent Crime

234/100k

Property Crime

809/100k

Population

167,609

State

Idaho

14

Twin Falls

Idaho

88/100

Violent Crime

234/100k

Property Crime

809/100k

Population

120,060

State

Idaho

15

Pocatello

Idaho

88/100

Violent Crime

234/100k

Property Crime

809/100k

Population

90,400

State

Idaho

16

Rexburg

Idaho

88/100

Violent Crime

234/100k

Property Crime

809/100k

Population

68,243

State

Idaho

17

Lewiston

Idaho

88/100

Violent Crime

234/100k

Property Crime

809/100k

Population

65,536

State

Idaho

18

Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford

Connecticut

85/100

Violent Crime

150/100k

Property Crime

1558/100k

Population

1,151,543

State

Connecticut

19

Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury

Connecticut

85/100

Violent Crime

150/100k

Property Crime

1558/100k

Population

951,558

State

Connecticut

20

New Haven

Connecticut

85/100

Violent Crime

150/100k

Property Crime

1558/100k

Population

568,158

State

Connecticut

21

Waterbury-Shelton

Connecticut

85/100

Violent Crime

150/100k

Property Crime

1558/100k

Population

456,128

State

Connecticut

22

Norwich-New London-Willimantic

Connecticut

85/100

Violent Crime

150/100k

Property Crime

1558/100k

Population

279,634

State

Connecticut

23

Torrington

Connecticut

85/100

Violent Crime

150/100k

Property Crime

1558/100k

Population

113,463

State

Connecticut

24

Putnam

Connecticut

85/100

Violent Crime

150/100k

Property Crime

1558/100k

Population

96,692

State

Connecticut

25

Cheyenne

Wyoming

84/100

Violent Crime

191/100k

Property Crime

1470/100k

Population

100,984

State

Wyoming

Frequently Asked Questions

Are smaller cities always safer?

Not necessarily. Some mid-size metros have very low crime rates, while others struggle. Our ranking looks at per-capita rates, not raw numbers, which levels the playing field.

What is the national average violent crime rate?

The US national average violent crime rate is approximately 380 incidents per 100,000 residents. Cities scoring below 200 are considered very safe.

Do crime rates vary within a metro area?

Significantly. Metro-level data aggregates city and suburban areas. Specific neighborhoods within a metro can be much safer or more dangerous than the overall metro average.